|
|||
|
Back to 2005 Chemical Tests N Balance Soil Pathogens P17 P5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colour |
Grey |
|
Texture |
Clay |
|
Free Carbonate |
Small effervescence |
|
Available P - Colwell (mg/kg) |
39 |
|
Available Potassium (mg/kg) |
840 |
|
Available S - KCl 40 (mg/kg) |
14 |
|
EC (dS/m) |
0.35 |
|
Organic Carbon (%) |
1.35 |
|
pH (calcium chloride) |
7.40 |
|
pH (water) |
8.10 |
|
Exchangeable Al (meq/100 g) |
<0.00 |
|
Exchangeable Cations |
|
|
Calcium (meq/100 g) |
29 |
|
Magnesium (meq/100 g) |
8 |
|
Sodium (meq/100 g) |
0.5 |
|
Potassium (meq/100 g) |
2 |
|
Sum of Cations |
|
|
|
|
Nitrate
And Available Water Test Results - March 2005
|
Paddock |
Crop
Planned For 2005 |
Potential
Yield (t/ha) |
Test
Results |
Soil Nitrate Supply And N Fertiliser Required To Achieve
Potential Yield |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Available Soil Water mm |
Nitrate mg/kg |
Available N At Sampling kg/ha |
N Available At Sowing kg/ha |
N Mineralised kg/ha |
Total Soil N Supply kg/ha |
N Fertiliser Required kg/ha
N |
Urea Equivalent kg/ha |
|
|
No 5 – Actually sown to Lentils |
Wheat |
3.9 |
25 |
10 |
84 |
84 |
47 |
131 |
24 |
53 |
|
|
No 6 |
Wheat |
3.7 |
15 |
10 |
84 |
126 |
47 |
173 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
No 8 |
Barley |
3.4 |
0 |
14 |
118 |
176 |
47 |
223 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
No 9 |
Barley |
4.3 |
48 |
15 |
126 |
126 |
47 |
173 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
No 13 |
Canola |
3.1 |
123 |
21 |
176 |
176 |
47 |
223 |
28 |
60 |
|
|
No 21 |
Wheat |
3.9 |
28 |
12 |
101 |
151 |
47 |
198 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Tuck 1E |
Wheat |
5.1 |
96 |
17 |
143 |
143 |
47 |
189 |
17 |
36 |
|
|
Paddock Name: |
Predicta B |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Agronomist Name: |
Mr John Stuchbery |
Agronomist Number: |
1027 |
|||||||||||||
|
Grower Name
& Address: |
M Jasper RMB 3000 HORSHAM
VIC 3401 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Telephone
Number: |
0353622222 |
Sample Date: |
17/03/2005 |
|
||||||||||||
|
Paddock Name: |
No 17 |
Predicta B |
|
|||||||||||||
|
Agronomist Name: |
Mr John Stuchbery |
Agronomist Number: |
1027 |
|||||||||||||
|
Grower Name & Address: |
M Jasper RMB 3000 HORSHAM VIC
3401 |
|||||||||||||||
|
Telephone Number: |
0353622222 |
Sample Date: |
17/03/2005 |
|||||||||||||
|
TEST |
RESULT |
RISK
CATEGORY |
|
||||||||||||
|
Below Detection |
Low
|
Medium
|
High
|
|
|||||||||||
|
CCN |
3 |
eggs / g soil |
|
* |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Take-all |
<20 |
pg DNA / g soil |
* |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Rhizoctonia |
<19.5 |
pg DNA / g soil |
* |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Pratylenchus neglectus |
7 |
nematodes / g soil |
|
* |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Pratylenchus thornei |
14 |
nematodes / g soil |
|
* |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Blackspot |
15 |
DNA / g soil |
|
* |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Take-all - Oat Race |
Not Detected |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Crown Rot (F. pseudograminearum) |
<3 |
pg DNA / g soil |
* |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Crown Rot (F. culmorum) |
<3 |
pg DNA / g soil |
* |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
* Risk categories should be used as a guide only, may be subject to regional and seasonal differences, and maybe revised over time.
|
Paddock History |
2 years ago |
Last year |
This year |
Crop
|
unknown |
lentils |
wheat |
|
Cultivar |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yitpi |
|
Core Depth: |
0-10 |
|
|
|
GENERAL
COMMENTS Interpretations
are based only on the data provided with the sample and the results of the
DNA analysis. Clients should not rely on these interpretations as the sole
source of advice as seasonal conditions, paddock history and other agronomic
factors may affect crop performance. A cereal rotation program is assumed and
where possible interpretations refer to the planned crop and cultivar advised
with the sample. *** HIGH
PRIORITY ISSUES *** CCN: In
medium to low rainfall areas potential yield loss in susceptible cereals
could be in the range of 5 - 25%. Since wheat is the planned crop sowing
resistant cultivars will prevent build up. LOW
PRIORITY ISSUES Pratylenchus neglectus: Risk of yield loss in cereals is minimal. Pratylenchus thornei: Low risk of significant yield loss. Focus on other diseases. Blackspot: Black spot levels are low but given that peas are not intended this
should not be an issue. If peas were to be considered a yield loss of 5-10%
could occur. |
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
Paddock
Name: |
|
|
|||
|
Agronomist
Name: |
Mr John Stuchbery |
Agronomist
Number: |
1027 |
||
|
Grower Name
& Address: |
M Jasper RMB 3000 HORSHAM
VIC 3401 |
||||
|
Telephone
Number: |
0353622222 |
Sample Date: |
17/03/2005 |
||
|
TEST |
RESULT |
RISK
CATEGORY |
||||
|
Below Detection |
Low
|
Medium
|
High
|
|||
|
CCN |
<1 |
eggs / g soil |
* |
|
|
|
|
Take-all |
129 |
pg DNA / g soil |
|
|
|
* |
|
Rhizoctonia |
<19.5 |
pg DNA / g soil |
* |
|
|
|
|
Pratylenchus neglectus |
18 |
nematodes / g soil |
|
* |
|
|
|
Pratylenchus thornei |
3 |
nematodes / g soil |
|
* |
|
|
|
Blackspot |
155 |
DNA / g soil |
|
|
|
* |
|
Take-all - Oat Race |
Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crown Rot (F. pseudograminearum) |
5 |
pg DNA / g soil |
|
* |
|
|
|
Crown Rot (F. culmorum) |
8 |
pg DNA / g soil |
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Risk categories should be
used as a guide only, may be subject to regional and seasonal differences, and
maybe revised over time.
|
Paddock History |
2 years ago |
Last year |
This year |
Crop |
unknown |
vetch |
wheat |
|
Cultivar |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
Core Depth: |
0-10 |
|
|
|
GENERAL COMMENTS Clients should not rely on these interpretations as the
sole source of advice as seasonal conditions, paddock history and other
agronomic factors may affect crop performance. Wheat should not be grown.
This padock needs another year out either as canola or as vetch again *** HIGH PRIORITY ISSUES *** Take-all: Potential yield loss in susceptible cereals is in the
range of 15 - 60%. Wheat should not be grown. Control of grasses in selected
crop or pasture is a high priority. Canola is a better alternative Oats
race: Oats race presence means
oats are not a suitable rotation crop for take-all management. Blackspot: Although peas are not intended the high level of
black spot should be noted. Peas should not be considered as an alternative
crop and volunteer peas should be controlled to reduce innoculum. LOW PRIORITY ISSUES Pratylenchus
neglectus: Risk of yield loss in
cereals is minimal. Pratylenchus
thornei: Low risk of significant
yield loss. Focus on other diseases. F.
pseudograminearum: F. culmorum: Levels detected at the low end of low risk
range for bread wheats. Yield losses likely to be minimal. Durum is more
susceptible than bread wheats but levels are still in the low range with
yield losses probably under 5%. |
Back to demonstration paddocks